• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

McOmber McOmber & Luber

Business & Employment Lawyers Red Bank & Marlton New Jersey

(732) 842-6500
  •   Free Consultation
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • History of the Firm
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Law
      • Business Law Practice Areas

      • Business Formation
      • Buy-Sell Agreements
      • Commercial Disputes
      • Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
      • Shareholder Disputes
    • Collections
      • Collections Practice Areas

      • Commercial Collections
      • Debt Collections
      • Judgment Enforcement
      • Personal Guarantee
      • Promissory Notes
    • Employment Contracts
      • Employment Contacts Practice Areas

      • Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure Agreements
      • Executive Agreements
      • Non-Compete Agreements
      • Severance Packages
    • Employment Discrimination
      • Employment Discrimination Practice Areas

      • Age Discrimination
      • Americans with Disabilities ACT (ADA)
      • Disability Discrimination
      • Gender Discrimination
      • HIV or Aids Discrimination
      • Hostile Work Environment
      • LGBT Discrimination in the Workplace
      • Pregnancy Discrimination
      • Racial Discrimination
      • Religious Discrimination in the Workplace
      • Sexual Orientation Discrimination in the Workplace
      • Wage Discrimination
      • EEOC Claims
    • Employment Law
      • Employment Law Practice Areas

      • At-Will Employment
      • EEOC Claims
      • Employment Classification
      • FMLA
      • New Jersey Division on Civil Rights
      • New Jersey Family Leave Act
      • New Jersey Law Against Discrimination
      • New Jersey Paid Sick Leave
      • Reduction in Force
      • Unemployment Compensation Appeals
      • Wrongful Termination
      • Misclassified Employees
      • Medical Leave Benefits in New Jersey
    • Litigation
      • Litigation Practice Areas

      • Civil Litigation
      • Contract Litigation
    • Class Actions
      • Class Action Practice Areas

      • Equal Pay Act
      • Overtime Claims
      • Tip Skimming
      • Misclassified Employees
    • Personal Injury
      • Personal Injury Practice Areas

      • Nursing Home Negligence
      • Product Liability
      • Uber Assault, Fraud, and Harassment
    • Real Estate
      • Real Estate Practice Areas

      • Land Use, Planning and Zoning
    • Sexual Harassment
      • Sexual Harassment Practice Areas

      • Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment
      • Housekeeper Sexual Harassment
      • LGBT Sexual Harassment
      • Medical Professional Abuse
      • Quid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment
      • Sexual Abuse
      • Sexual Harassment in Doctors’ Offices and Healthcare
      • Sexual Harassment in Nursing
      • Sexual Harassment of Administrative Assistants
      • Sexual Harassment of Housekeeping and Janitorial Workers
      • Sexual Harassment Retaliation
    • Wage & Hour
      • Wage & Hour Practice Areas

      • Equal Pay Act
      • Overtime Claims
      • Tip Skimming
    • Government Fraud/False Claims Act
      • False Claims Act Practice Areas

      • Qui Tam Action
    • Whistleblowing & Retaliation
      • Whistleblowing & Retaliation Practice Areas

      • Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA)
      • Whistleblower
      • Workplace Retaliation
    • Other Legal Services
      • Other Legal Services

      • Estate Law
  • Team
  • FAQs
  • Our Successes
    • Client Reviews
    • Verdicts & Settlements
    • Representative Clients
  • News
  • Office Locations
  • Contact Us
Amazon Must Defend Allegations of New Jersey Wage and Hour Law Violations | Header Image | McOmber McOmber & Luber

Amazon Must Defend Allegations of New Jersey Wage and Hour Law Violations

July 24, 2020 by Red Bank Legal

On June 29, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey held that Amazon must defend itself in a proposed class action lawsuit brought by warehouse employees. The action alleges violations of New Jersey wage and hour law. The suit seeks compensation for time spent undergoing required security screenings.

The Allegations Against Amazon

The complaint alleges that at the end of each shift, Amazon workers were required to submit to a lengthy security screening. They were also allegedly required to submit to this screening during their required 30-minute unpaid meal break if they wished to leave the premises. The complaint also states that Amazon employees were effectively unable to leave the premises to conduct personal business during their meal breaks due to the amount of time it took to go through security, the facility’s large parking lot, and its remote location.

The security measures allegedly require employees to walk through a metal detector and place their personal items on a conveyor belt for x-ray scanning. Moreover, according to the complaint, if Amazon decides that additional examination is necessary, an employee must then submit to a mandatory “secondary screening.” This secondary screening involves reporting to a separate screening area so that a security guard can search the employee.

The District Court’s Rulings

Ultimately, the District Court held that time spent in post-shift screenings would be held compensable, while the meal breaks would not.

The District Court’s judgment relied partially on New Jersey wage and hour law regulations. These regulations define “hours worked” as all the time the employee is required to be at his or her place of work on duty. The District Court also cited to precedent under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, concluding that a “place of work” is any place where an activity is performed that is controlled or required by the employer and such activity serves to primarily benefit the employer. The District Court ruled that the security screenings met that criteria because the activity is controlled by and is for Amazon’s primary benefit.

However, on the matter of meal breaks, the District Court ruled in Amazon’s favor. The District Court reasoned that unlike the mandatory post-shift security screenings, which are required to exit Amazon’s premises and which serve only to benefit Amazon, the security check during the workday is a result of the employee’s choice to take a meal break off-premises. The court reasoned that this serves primarily to benefit the employee, and not Amazon. The complaint did not allege that Amazon employees were required to exit Amazon’s premises to take meal breaks, or that the consequence of such choice primarily benefited Amazon. For these reasons, the court held that any time spent during meal breaks is not time spent at the “place of work.”

New Jersey Wage And Hour Law

New Jersey Wage and Hour Law requires that employees be paid at least one and a half times their regular rate for any hours worked over 40 in a workweek. Always carefully calculate whether wages have been correctly paid.

Any New Jersey employee who feels their paycheck does not accurately reflect the work they are doing has the right to question their employer’s practices without fear of retaliation. The Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA) provides general whistleblower protection to the employee who brings to light illegal, fraudulent, or criminal behavior of his/her employer.

If there is any adverse employment action against that employee, the employer may be liable for any damages and legal fees incurred by the employee. The employee has the responsibility to first inform the employer in writing of the complaint and give them time to correct it.

The Takeaway

Ultimately, New Jersey employers who wish to implement pre/post shift screenings must be aware that the time spent in these screenings is counted as “hours worked.” Employers should be sure that clocking in/out of work is done in a way that ensures employees are compensated for this time.

Contact Our Employment Law Attorneys For A Free Consultation

At McOmber McOmber & Luber, we take a proactive approach to each and every legal issue our clients face, helping both employers and employees with legal areas including wage and hour, discrimination, litigation, whistleblowing, and retaliation issues. Please call our Red Bank office at 732-842-6500, our Marlton office at 856-985-9800, our Newark office at 973-878-9040, or contact us at 888-396-0736 or online for a free consultation. We represent clients throughout New Jersey.

Filed Under: Wage and Hour Claims

Primary Sidebar

Related Practice Areas

  • Wage & Hour Attorney | Blog | McOmber McOmber & Luber
    Wage & Hour Attorney

Red Bank Office

  • 54 Shrewsbury Avenue, Red Bank, NJ 07701
    732-842-6500
    732-530-8545
    [email protected]

Marlton Office

  • 39 E. Main Street, Marlton, NJ 08053
    856-985-9800
    856-263-2450
    [email protected]

Newark Office

  • 60 Park Place Suite 307, Newark, NJ 07102
    973-878-9040
    973-310-5216
    [email protected]

Office Locations

Red Bank Office

  • 54 Shrewsbury Avenue, Red Bank, NJ 07701
  • 732-842-6500

Marlton Office

  • 39 E. Main Street, Marlton, NJ 08053
  • 856-985-9800

Newark Office

  • 60 Park Place Suite 307, Newark, NJ 07102
  • 973-878-9040

Footer

McOmber McOmber & Luber

McOmber McOmber & Luber is focused on delivering exceptional representation and responsive client service. We tailor innovative and cost-effective solutions for each matter we handle.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Practice Areas
  • Team
  • Office Locations
  • FAQ
  • Press
  • Our Successes
  • Contact Us
  • Awards & Honors
  • Civil Certified Attorney
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Client Reviews

Practice Areas

  • Business Law
  • Collections
  • Employment Contracts
  • Employment Discrimination
  • Employment Law
  • Litigation
  • Personal Injury
  • Real Estate
  • Sexual Harassment
  • Wage & Hour Attorney
  • Whistleblowing & Retaliation
  • Other Legal Services

Copyright © 2022 · McOmber McOmber & Luber, P.C. All Rights Reserved

  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Log In

No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.

This website’s information does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice or form an attorney-client relationship. All content is for general information and may not constitute the most up-to-date legal information. You should consult with an attorney for advice on specific legal problems. Read the full Disclaimer here.

Free Consultation