• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

McOmber McOmber & Luber

Business & Employment Lawyers Red Bank & Marlton New Jersey

(732) 842-6500
  •   Free Consultation
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • History of the Firm
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Law
      • Business Law Practice Areas

      • Business Formation
      • Buy-Sell Agreements
      • Commercial Disputes
      • Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
      • Shareholder Disputes
    • Collections
      • Collections Practice Areas

      • Commercial Collections
      • Debt Collections
      • Judgment Enforcement
      • Personal Guarantee
      • Promissory Notes
    • Employment Contracts
      • Employment Contacts Practice Areas

      • Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure Agreements
      • Executive Agreements
      • Non-Compete Agreements
      • Severance Packages
    • Employment Discrimination
      • Employment Discrimination Practice Areas

      • Age Discrimination
      • Americans with Disabilities ACT (ADA)
      • Disability Discrimination
      • Gender Discrimination
      • HIV or Aids Discrimination
      • Hostile Work Environment
      • LGBT Discrimination in the Workplace
      • Pregnancy Discrimination
      • Racial Discrimination
      • Religious Discrimination in the Workplace
      • Sexual Orientation Discrimination in the Workplace
      • Wage Discrimination
      • EEOC Claims
    • Employment Law
      • Employment Law Practice Areas

      • At-Will Employment
      • EEOC Claims
      • FMLA
      • New Jersey Division on Civil Rights
      • New Jersey Family Leave Act
      • New Jersey Law Against Discrimination
      • New Jersey Paid Sick Leave
      • Reduction in Force
      • Unemployment Compensation Appeals
      • Wrongful Termination
      • Misclassified Employees
      • Medical Leave Benefits in New Jersey
      • Work From Home Laws
    • Litigation
      • Litigation Practice Areas

      • Civil Litigation
      • Contract Litigation
    • Class Actions
      • Class Action Practice Areas

      • Equal Pay Act
      • Overtime Pay
      • Tip Skimming
      • Misclassified Employees
    • Personal Injury
      • Personal Injury Practice Areas

      • Nursing Home Negligence
      • Product Liability
      • Uber Assault, Fraud, and Harassment
    • Real Estate
      • Real Estate Practice Areas

      • Land Use, Planning and Zoning
    • Sexual Harassment
      • Sexual Harassment Practice Areas

      • Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment
      • Housekeeper Sexual Harassment
      • LGBT Sexual Harassment
      • Medical Professional Abuse
      • Quid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment
      • Sexual Abuse
      • Sexual Harassment in Doctors’ Offices and Healthcare
      • Sexual Harassment in Nursing
      • Sexual Harassment of Administrative Assistants
      • Sexual Harassment of Housekeeping and Janitorial Workers
      • Sexual Harassment Retaliation
      • Sexual Harassment in Dental Offices
      • Sexual Harassment in the Entertainment Industry
      • Sexual Harassment in Bars and Restaurants
    • Wage & Hour
      • Wage & Hour Practice Areas

      • Equal Pay Act
      • Overtime Pay
      • Tip Skimming
      • Tipped Employees
    • Government Fraud/False Claims Act
      • False Claims Act Practice Areas

      • Qui Tam Action
      • Prevailing Wage & False Claims Act
    • Whistleblowing & Retaliation
      • Whistleblowing & Retaliation Practice Areas

      • Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA)
      • Whistleblower
      • Workplace Retaliation
      • Consumer Fraud Attorney
    • Other Legal Services
      • Other Legal Services

      • Estate Law
  • Our Successes
    • Client Reviews
    • Verdicts & Settlements
    • Representative Clients
  • Team
  • FAQs
  • News
  • Office Locations
  • Contact Us

Supreme Court Bans Employee Class Action Suits

June 19, 2018 by Red Bank Legal

Middletown Employment Lawyers weigh in on the Supreme Court ban on employee class action suits.The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a significant decision involving the right of employees to file class action lawsuits against their employers. By blocking class action lawsuits by employees who signed arbitration agreements, the Court ruled in favor of employers and against the employees disputing the underpayment of their overtime wages.

Epic Systems Cor v. Lewis

In the matter of Epic Systems Cor. v. Lewis, employees filed suit to join a federal class action lawsuit based on allegations of their employer violating the Fair Labor Standards Act by underpayment of overtime wages. All the involved employees had previously signed arbitration contracts prohibiting collective legal proceedings. In a 5-to-4 decision in favor of the employers, the Court held that federal arbitration law took precedence over a federal labor law protecting workers’ rights to collectively bargain. The signed arbitration contracts were legal and enforceable, thereby preventing the employees from joining a class action lawsuit.

By finding signed arbitration agreements must be enforced as written, the Court favored the language of the Federal Arbitration Act over the National Labor Relations Act. The Federal Arbitration Act is meant to promote arbitration as an alternative to filing suit; the National Labor Relations Act is designed to protect workers. The Court held that employees failed to prove the arbitration agreements, which required employees to file individualized arbitration proceedings rather than class action lawsuits, violated federal law.

While the conservative majority focused on the interpretation of the language of the arbitration law, the liberal minority stressed that the ability of workers to confront employers collectively has been a priority since the 1930s and the New Deal. Highlighting the difficulty some workers face in filing lawsuits on their own to dispute unfair or unjust wages, the Court’s Minority decision emphasized that federal labor laws allowing workers to band together offers an important and necessary protection for workers.

Strength in Numbers

Supporters of employees’ rights to collectively bargain believe employees have strength in numbers and often need combined financial resources to fight employers in a wage dispute. The employees in the Epic Systems case were disputing overtime pay claims too small to be worth pursuing individually due to the high costs of litigation.

Justice Ginsburg’s Opinion

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote a dissenting opinion finding the decision wrong for failing to give employees and employers equal footing with respect to wage bargaining. Her opinion stressed that the National Labor Relations Act was passed to address workplace power imbalance between vulnerable workers and employers, which should not be ignored.

She further cautioned this decision would result in a lack of enforcement of state and federal labor laws and the return to take it or leave it and yellow dog employment contracts, which attempt to block employees from joining unions and suppress a worker’s right to seek legal remedies for employment grievances or wage disputes. Justice Ginsburg characterized the Majority’s decision as a destructive result that ignored the last 80 years of federal labor laws.

Middletown Employment Lawyers at McOmber McOmber & Luber, P.C. Handle All Matters of Employment Law

The experienced Middletown employment lawyers at McOmber McOmber & Luber, P.C. represent New Jersey employees and employers in a wide variety of employment law matters, including class actions and wage and hour disputes.

Call our Red Bank office at 732-842-6500, our Marlton office at 856-985-9800, our Newark office at 973-878-9040, or contact us at 888-396-0736 or online for a free consultation. We represent clients throughout New Jersey.

Filed Under: Employment Lawyers, Wage and Hour Claims

Primary Sidebar

Related Practice Areas

  • Wage & Hour Attorney | Blog | McOmber McOmber & Luber
    Wage & Hour Attorney

Red Bank Office

  • 54 Shrewsbury Avenue, Red Bank, NJ 07701
    732.842.6500
    732.530.8545
    info@njlegal.com

Marlton Office

  • 39 E. Main Street, Marlton, NJ 08053
    856.985.9800
    856.263.2450
    info@njlegal.com

Newark Office

  • 60 Park Place Suite 307, Newark, NJ 07102
    973.878.9040
    973.310.5216
    info@njlegal.com

Footer

McOmber McOmber & Luber

McOmber McOmber & Luber is focused on delivering exceptional representation and responsive client service. We tailor innovative and cost-effective solutions for each matter we handle.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Practice Areas
  • Team
  • Office Locations
  • FAQ
  • Press
  • Our Successes
  • Contact Us
  • Awards & Honors
  • Civil Certified Attorney
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Client Reviews

Practice Areas

  • Business Law
  • Collections
  • Employment Contracts
  • Employment Discrimination
  • Employment Law
  • Litigation
  • Personal Injury
  • Real Estate
  • Sexual Harassment
  • Wage & Hour Attorney
  • Whistleblowing & Retaliation
  • Other Legal Services

Copyright © 2023 · McOmber McOmber & Luber, P.C. All Rights Reserved

  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Log In

No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.

This website’s information does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice or form an attorney-client relationship. All content is for general information and may not constitute the most up-to-date legal information. You should consult with an attorney for advice on specific legal problems. Read the full Disclaimer here. Your Privacy Choices Notice at Collection

Free Consultation