• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

McOmber McOmber & Luber

Business & Employment Lawyers Red Bank & Marlton New Jersey

(732) 842-6500
  •   Free Consultation
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • History of the Firm
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Law
      • Business Law Practice Areas

      • Business Formation
      • Buy-Sell Agreements
      • Commercial Disputes
      • Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
      • Shareholder Disputes
    • Collections
      • Collections Practice Areas

      • Commercial Collections
      • Debt Collections
      • Judgment Enforcement
      • Personal Guarantee
      • Promissory Notes
    • Employment Contracts
      • Employment Contacts Practice Areas

      • Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure Agreements
      • Executive Agreements
      • Non-Compete Agreements
      • Severance Packages
    • Employment Discrimination
      • Employment Discrimination Practice Areas

      • Age Discrimination
      • Americans with Disabilities ACT (ADA)
      • Disability Discrimination
      • Gender Discrimination
      • HIV or Aids Discrimination
      • Hostile Work Environment
      • LGBT Discrimination in the Workplace
      • Pregnancy Discrimination
      • Racial Discrimination
      • Religious Discrimination in the Workplace
      • Sexual Orientation Discrimination in the Workplace
      • Wage Discrimination
      • EEOC Claims
    • Employment Law
      • Employment Law Practice Areas

      • At-Will Employment
      • EEOC Claims
      • FMLA
      • New Jersey Division on Civil Rights
      • New Jersey Family Leave Act
      • New Jersey Law Against Discrimination
      • New Jersey Paid Sick Leave
      • Reduction in Force
      • Unemployment Compensation Appeals
      • Wrongful Termination
      • Misclassified Employees
      • Medical Leave Benefits in New Jersey
      • Work From Home Laws
    • Litigation
      • Litigation Practice Areas

      • Civil Litigation
      • Contract Litigation
    • Class Actions
      • Class Action Practice Areas

      • Equal Pay Act
      • Overtime Pay
      • Tip Skimming
      • Misclassified Employees
    • Personal Injury
      • Personal Injury Practice Areas

      • Nursing Home Negligence
      • Product Liability
      • Uber Assault, Fraud, and Harassment
    • Real Estate
      • Real Estate Practice Areas

      • Land Use, Planning and Zoning
    • Sexual Harassment
      • Sexual Harassment Practice Areas

      • Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment
      • Housekeeper Sexual Harassment
      • LGBT Sexual Harassment
      • Medical Professional Abuse
      • Quid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment
      • Sexual Abuse
      • Sexual Harassment in Doctors’ Offices and Healthcare
      • Sexual Harassment in Nursing
      • Sexual Harassment of Administrative Assistants
      • Sexual Harassment of Housekeeping and Janitorial Workers
      • Sexual Harassment Retaliation
      • Sexual Harassment in Dental Offices
      • Sexual Harassment in the Entertainment Industry
      • Sexual Harassment in Bars and Restaurants
    • Wage & Hour
      • Wage & Hour Practice Areas

      • Equal Pay Act
      • Overtime Pay
      • Tip Skimming
      • Tipped Employees
    • Government Fraud/False Claims Act
      • False Claims Act Practice Areas

      • Qui Tam Action
      • Prevailing Wage & False Claims Act
    • Whistleblowing & Retaliation
      • Whistleblowing & Retaliation Practice Areas

      • Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA)
      • Whistleblower
      • Workplace Retaliation
      • Consumer Fraud Attorney
    • Other Legal Services
      • Other Legal Services

      • Estate Law
  • Our Successes
    • Client Reviews
    • Verdicts & Settlements
    • Representative Clients
  • Team
  • FAQs
  • News
  • Office Locations
  • Contact Us

Hostile Behavior Directed at Gay Employee Prompts Title VII Claim

July 6, 2018 by Red Bank Legal

Nestle Waters is the latest employer to face a sexual harassment lawsuit in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. According to a complaint filed in the matter of Mateo v. Nestle Waters North America, Inc., a gay employee of the bottled water company allegedly was the victim of a hostile work environment, discrimination, and retaliation at a Nestle Waters distribution facility.

The employee, who identifies as gay or bisexual, alleges that shortly after beginning work at the distribution facility, a supervisor and co-workers engaged in harassing behavior that included making anti-gay comments in his presence, touching his nipples, threatening physical violence with a knife, inviting the employee to engage in sexual relations, and calling him offensive names in the presence of a least one supervisor. The employee reported the alleged harassment to Nestle Human Resources in the summer of 2012 but no investigation took place. Nestle claims that it conducted anti-harassment training in July 2013, which ended the anti-gay remarks by the co-workers and the supervisor, which the employee disputes.

Nestle Finds Loophole

After several physical altercations with a co-worker (which Nestle contends was instigated by the plaintiff although it was documented that the co-worker used anti-gay language), Nestle terminated the gay employee while his co-worker retained his position. Nestle alleges that following the termination, they discovered that the employee had omitted or misrepresented pertinent information on his employment application, including that he was let go by previous employers on the basis of poor performance or conduct. The employee subsequently filed a federal lawsuit claiming violations of Title VII and the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, based on sexual orientation discrimination, sexual harassment, a hostile work environment, and retaliation.

Court Rejects Nestle’s Claims

The New Jersey federal district court recently denied Nestle’s motion for summary judgment on the hostile work environment, sex discrimination, and retaliation counts, allowing the employee to go forward with these claims. With respect to the hostile work environment claims, the court held that a reasonable jury could conclude the employee suffered “severe and pervasive” harassment. The court was unable, as a matter of law, to determine whether Nestle was vicariously liable for the alleged sexual harassment.

There were sufficient disputed material facts relating to this issue, such as whether the co-worker who allegedly witnessed the harassment qualified as a management level employee, the date Nestle had notice of the alleged harassment, and whether Nestle took prompt and adequate action after receiving such notice.

Nestle’s argument that the employee was unable to demonstrate discrimination as his termination resulted from his physical altercation with his co-workers was also rejected by the court. The court suggested Nestle’s stated reason for firing the employee could be a pretext as other non-gay employees were not fired for similar behavior.

With respect to the retaliation claims, the Court found that as a matter of law, Nestle could not prove a lack of casual connection between the plaintiff’s complaint and his termination, given the close proximity between the employee’s harassment complaint in July 2013 and his termination in September 2013, along with the employer’s failure to fire heterosexual employees for similar behavior.

Red Bank LGBTQ Discrimination Lawyers at McOmber McOmber & Luber, P.C. Fight for Victims of Discrimination in the Workplace

The experienced Red Bank LGBTQ discrimination lawyers at McOmber McOmber & Luber, P.C. represent New Jersey employees and employers in a wide variety of employment related matters, including sexual harassment and discrimination cases. With offices conveniently located in Red Bank and Marlton, New Jersey, we proudly represent clients throughout the state. Call our Red Bank office at 732-842-6500, our Marlton office at 856-985-9800, our Newark office at 973-878-9040, or contact us at 888-396-0736 or online for a free consultation. We represent clients throughout New Jersey.

Filed Under: Retaliation, LGBTQ, Sexual Harassment

Primary Sidebar

Related Practice Areas

  • LGBT Discrimination in the Workplace | Blog | McOmber McOmber & Luber
    LGBT Discrimination in the Workplace

Red Bank Office

  • 54 Shrewsbury Avenue, Red Bank, NJ 07701
    732.842.6500
    732.530.8545
    info@njlegal.com

Marlton Office

  • 39 E. Main Street, Marlton, NJ 08053
    856.985.9800
    856.263.2450
    info@njlegal.com

Newark Office

  • 60 Park Place Suite 307, Newark, NJ 07102
    973.878.9040
    973.310.5216
    info@njlegal.com

Footer

McOmber McOmber & Luber

McOmber McOmber & Luber is focused on delivering exceptional representation and responsive client service. We tailor innovative and cost-effective solutions for each matter we handle.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Practice Areas
  • Team
  • Office Locations
  • FAQ
  • Press
  • Our Successes
  • Contact Us
  • Awards & Honors
  • Civil Certified Attorney
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Client Reviews

Practice Areas

  • Business Law
  • Collections
  • Employment Contracts
  • Employment Discrimination
  • Employment Law
  • Litigation
  • Personal Injury
  • Real Estate
  • Sexual Harassment
  • Wage & Hour Attorney
  • Whistleblowing & Retaliation
  • Other Legal Services

Copyright © 2023 · McOmber McOmber & Luber, P.C. All Rights Reserved

  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Log In

No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.

This website’s information does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice or form an attorney-client relationship. All content is for general information and may not constitute the most up-to-date legal information. You should consult with an attorney for advice on specific legal problems. Read the full Disclaimer here. Your Privacy Choices Notice at Collection

Free Consultation